Antick has six engines, and you rarely need them all at once. Each engine is built to answer one question well. So start from your question, not from the menu.
The question map
| Your question | Engine | Start from |
|---|---|---|
| What market is this, and is it worth reading? | Market State Intelligence (MSI) | Market Structure Analysis |
| How is the crowd reading it? | Market Perception Intelligence (MPI) | Perception vs Reality Gap |
| Is anyone quietly building a position? | Silent Accumulation Intelligence (SAI) | Silent Accumulation Analysis |
| Is this order book real or being played? | Liquidity Behavior Intelligence (LBI) | Fake & Trap Detection |
| Does the larger timeframe support this? | Smart Cross-TimeFrame Alignment (SCTA) | Timeframe Alignment Matrix |
| Which assets stand out from the whole market? | Smart Market Overview & Discovery (SMOD) | Discovery Intelligence |
The same pages on every engine
MSI, MPI, SAI, LBI and SCTA share the same page pattern. Understand one engine and you can read the others.
- Intelligence: reads the whole market.
- Structure Analysis: explains one asset in plain language.
- Metrics Breakdown: shows every number behind the read.
- Multi-Timeframe: shows the same read on every timeframe.
A practical reading order
- Start with the market picture in SMOD or Market Ranking.
- Choose one asset, then read its structure in MSI.
- Check higher-timeframe support in SCTA.
- See the crowd's mood in MPI and quiet positioning in SAI.
- Finish with order book quality in LBI.
You do not have to complete all five steps. Stop when the picture is clear.
When engines disagree
A disagreement is also information. Healthy Trend in MSI with Fake Alignment in SCTA means the structure looks good on your timeframe but is not backed by the timeframe above it.
Another example: Retail FOMO in MPI while accumulation is weakening can mean the crowd has arrived late. When reads conflict, the picture is less settled.
Case study: MSI and SCTA disagree on BTC
On October 30, 2026, on the 1H candle that closed at 19:00 UTC, two engines read BTC in opposite directions.
| Engine | Regime | Bias | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSI | Awaiting Confirmation | UP | 82% |
| SCTA | Fake Alignment | DOWN | 3% |
SCTA also recorded 10 of 10 timeframes pointing down, with 12H as the strongest timeframe at 84% confidence. But its confidence on 1H was only 3%, so the DOWN read itself was weak on this timeframe.
So do not simply pick one engine. MSI had not confirmed the structure, and SCTA called the alignment false. Both described a read that was not yet clear.
One hour after that read, BTC rose 0.36% to 76,891 on Binance Futures. On the candle that closed at 20:00 UTC, MSI changed to Structure Change with a Weak trend. One candle is too short to judge which engine was closer.
One term that is easy to confuse
The abbreviation MPI has two meanings in Antick. As an engine, MPI means Market Perception Intelligence. Inside an LBI card, MPI means Manipulation Probability Index, the number behind the Spoofing Pressure card.
Related guides: Which engine answers your question?
